Battery Burns Kid’s Underpants; Parent’s Sue
Friday, March 13th, 2009This is just stupid. Go read this article: iPod touch—not[sic] lies—sets kid’s pants on fire; parents sue
Okay, did you read that? Apple and the Apple Store employees are being held accountable for not informing this lady that putting a lithium-ion battery in your pocket could, potentially, result in physical harm if something is messed up. So here’s my thoughts: the kid probably didn’t treat this thing too well, and some piece internally got busted resulting in an over/under charge on the battery somehow (I could be wrong, I’m not an EE after all). Guess what lady, your cell-phone can probably go up just as easily.
I think if it can be proven that there was a legitimate manufacturing defect, then yes, Apple should pay for the doctors fees, and there shouldn’t be any time needed in front of a judge. However, I would also ask – why did the kid have it in his pants pocket while at school? Granted this could have happened at any time, but ‘back in my day’ (and I really feel old when I say this) we weren’t allowed to have that kinda stuff on our person during the school day. Not that anyone had things like that to begin with, it was more likely someone would be carrying a cell phone, minidisc player (remember those?) or a CD player…MP3 players were just a little too expensive at the time.
So, let this serve as a warning – lithium ion batteries can be dangerous, but they’re also everywhere. An electronic device is not like a car – you can’t leave it out in the snow/sun/whatever and expect it to work like it did the first day you bought it…of course, I guess you can’t really expect that with cars either…
